“Meditation on the Frame”: Ortega’s Dialogue with Modernity and Postmodernity

Authors

  • Francisco La Rubia Prado Universidad de Georgetown (Washington)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63487/reo.683

Keywords:

Frame, hermetism, modernity, postmodernity, formalism, homogeneity, heterogeneity

Abstract

My essay on Meditación del marco (1921) [Meditation on Frames] will explore two essential issues. First of all, it will demonstrate how Meditación already contains in microcosm the central ideas of Ortega’s aesthetic thinking throughout the1920’s. These aesthetics are closely related to the critical thinking of the Russian Formalists, as well as to the cultural and philosophical discourse of Modernity. Second, the paper will show how Ortega’s treatment of frames in Meditacion is also closely connected with the philosophical concerns of Postmodernity, this through an examination of its close links with Derrida’s argument and objectives in his essay on frames entitled “Parergon” (La vérité en peinture, 1978). Thus, my comparative analyses will affirm that the ideas and rhetoric of Meditación del marco place Ortega simultaneously in a dialogue with both Modernity and contemporary Postmodern culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Francisco La Rubia Prado, Universidad de Georgetown (Washington)

Professor in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese at Georgetown University (Washington), he is the author of books such as Back to the Future: Love, Death, and Disillusionment in Spanish Romanticism (2004), Unamuno and Life as Fiction (1999), and Allegory of the Will. Organic Thought, Rhetoric, and Deconstruction in the Work of Miguel de Unamuno (1996). Among his many articles on Spanish intellectual history, several on Ortega stand out: “Configurations of German and Spanish Intellectual History and Aesthetics: Goethe, Novalis, Unamuno, and Ortega y Gasset” (2000) and “The Question of Literary Genre: The ‘Avant-garde Ortega’ and the Russian Formalists” (1998).

References

CULLER, JONATHAN (1982), On Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell UP.

– (1984), Sobre la deconstrucción, Trad. Luis Cremades. Madrid: Cátedra.

DERRIDA, JACQUES (1976), Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: The Jonhs Hopkins UP.

– (1987), The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoff Benninton and Ian McLeod. Chicago: Chicago UP.

EAGLETON, TERRY (1983), Literary Theory. Minneapolis: Minneapolis UP.

ERLICH, VICTOR (1981), Russian Formalism. 3 ed. New Haven: Yale UP.

JAMESON, FREDRIC (1974), The Prison-House of Language. Princeton: Princeton UP.

KANT, MANUEL (1984), Crítica del juicio. Trad. Manuel García Morente. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.

LEMON, LEE T., y REIS, MARION J., trad. y ed. (1965), Russian Formalist Criticism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

MCGOWAN, JOHN (1991), Postmodernism and Its Critics. Ithaca: Cornell UP.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, JOSÉ (1995), Ideas sobre el teatro y la novela. Madrid: Alianza.

– (1983), La deshumanización del arte. Madrid: Alianza.

– Obras completas. 12 volúmenes. Vol. 2. Madrid: Revista de Occidente-Alianza Editorial, 1987.

SKLOVSKY, VICTOR, “Art as Technique.” Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Robert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer. Third ed. New York: Longman, 1994.

SIMMEL, GEORG (1997), Simmel on Culture. Ed. David Frisby and Mike Featherstone. London: Sage.

TODOROV, TZVETAN (1987), Literature and Its Critics. Trad. Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell UP.

Published

2004-05-01 — Updated on 2004-05-01

How to Cite

La Rubia Prado, F. (2004). “Meditation on the Frame”: Ortega’s Dialogue with Modernity and Postmodernity. Revista De Estudios Orteguianos (Journal of Orteguian Studies), (8/9), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.63487/reo.683

Issue

Section

Articles