Georg Simmel, Ortega y Gasset, and the Return to Traditional Metaphysics: Toward a Philosophy of Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63487/reo.463Keywords:
José Ortega y Gasset, Georg Simmel, totality of being, everything that exists, natural sciences, traditional metaphysics, neo-Kantian philosophy, philosophy of lifeAbstract
This paper deals with the interpretation of Georg Simmel and Ortega y Gasset to the traditional metaphysic. At the first decade of the 20th century both philosophers appropriated the neo-Kantian approach to the objective of philosophy and did not consider the metaphysical discussion as pivot within the philosophical discussion. At the second decade of the 20th century they both formulated a philosophy which is based on the acknowledgement of the importance of metaphysic for dealing with the objectives of philosophy. The main contention in this article is that this evolution in their thought is best understood when considering their effort to rethink the relationship between philosophy and natural sciences. While they were delving into the history of philosophy they both agreed that the objective of philosophy must be completely differentiated from the objective of the natural sciences. Unlike the neo-Kantian philosophers they argued that philosophy must deal with “the totality of being” (Simmel) or “everything that exists” (Ortega). Based on this argument these two philosophers tried to explain why they could not continue to embrace the neo-Kantian philosophy which tied together the objectives of philosophy and these of the natural sciences.
Downloads
References
CEREZO, P. (1984): La voluntad de aventura. Aproximación crítica al pensamiento de Ortega y Gasset. Barcelona: Ariel.
CHOMSKY, N. (1996): “Language and Thought: Some reflections on Venerable Themes”, en Powers and Prospects. Reflections on Human Nature and Social Order. Boston: South End Press, pp. 1-11.
COHEN, H. (1902): Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin: Bruno-Cassirer.
DAHME, H.-J. (1984): “Das Abgrenzunsproblem von Philosophie und Wissenschaft bei Georg Simmel”, en DAHME, H.-J. und RAMMSTEDT, O. (eds.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne. Neve Interpretationen und Materialien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
EDEL, G. (1991): “Kantianismus oder Platonismus? Hypothesis als Grundbegriff der Philosophie Cohens”, Il Cannocchiale. Rivista di studi filosofici, Bd. 1-2: I filosofi della scuola di Marburgo, pp. 59-87.
FRISCHEISEN-KÖHLER, M. (1920): “Georg Simmel”, Kant-Studien, 24, pp. 1-51.
GIL VILLEGAS, F. (1996): Los profetas y el Mesías. Lukács y Ortega como precursores de Heidegger en el Zeitgeist de la modernidad (1900-1929). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
HOLZHEY, H. (2005): “Cohen and the Marburg School in Context”, en MUNK, R. (ed.), Herman Cohen’s Critical Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer, Amsterdam Studies in Jewish Thought, pp. 3-37.
KANT, I. (2000): Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by GUYER, P. and WOOD, A. W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
MARÍAS AGUILERA, J. (1973): Ortega. Circunstancia y vocación. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
MEDÍN, T. (2005): El cristal y sus reflexiones. Nueve intérpretes españoles de Ortega y Gasset. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
NATORP, P. (1912): “Kant und die Marburger SchüLe”, Kant-Studien, 17, pp.193-222.
ORRINGER, N. R. (1979): Ortega y sus fuentes germánicas. Madrid: Gredos.
ORTEGA SPOTTORNO, J. (2003): Los Ortega. Madrid: Taurus.
ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. (1983): Obras completas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
— (1984): ¿Qué es conocimiento? Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
— (1991): Cartas de un joven español. Madrid: El Arquero.
— (1995): ¿Qué es filosofía? Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, colección Austral.
SAN MARTÍN, J. (1998): Fenomenología y cultura en Ortega. Ensayos de interpretación. Madrid: Tecnos.
SIMMEL, G. (1978): The Philosophy of Money, translated by BOTTOMORE, T. and FRISBY, D. London, Henley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
— (1996): Hauptprobleme der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
— (1997): Kant. Sechzehn Vorlesungen gehalten an der Berliner Universität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
— (1999): Lebensanchauung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
SLUGA, H. D. (1980): Gottlob Frege. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
