José Ortega y Gasset: A Pragmatist Perspective on History

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63487/reo.181

Keywords:

Ortega y Gasset, Pragmatism, Perspectivism, Philosophy of History, United States

Abstract

The theory of history is a central topic in Ortega’s writings. The American pragmatists wrote little on history. Ortega had fervent critiques of American Pragmatism. The argument presented here is that there are similarities in his theory on history with a pragmatist view, nonetheless, which can be summarized as a pragmatist perspectivism on the philosophy of history and historiography. Historical data selected for recording is largely determined by pragmatic reasoning; the historical details are useful, meaningful, relevant, and interesting –and continue to be– as they help us solve problems, since a study of the past is effective in helping us better prepare for the future. There is important epistemological and metaphysical value to be found in a pragmatist perspective on history and historiography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marnie Faye Binder

She holds a bachelor's degree in history and psychology from the University of California, San Diego; a master's degree in humanities and social thought from New York University; and a PhD in man and thought in history from the University of Alcalá. She is an adjunct professor of philosophy at California State University (Sacramento).

Her publications include: “Jaspers and Ortega on the Historicity of Being Human” in Existenz, 14/1 (2019); “Ortega's Pragmatist Perspectivism: On the Problem of Relativism,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 3 (2019); “José Ortega y Gasset's Pragmatist Theory of History” in Ardavín Trabanco, Carlos X. and Lastra, Antonio, Meditaciones Orteguianas; "F.C.S. Schiller’s Pragmatist Philosophy of History,” Contemporary Pragmatism Volume 14, Number 4 (2017); “A Possible Historicist Dialogue between William James and José Ortega y Gasset,” La Torre del Virrey, number 14 (2013); “Anti-Dualism in History and Nature,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2010) and “What is an Author?,” Philosophy Now, Volume 60 (March/April 2007).

References

DEWEY, J. (1938): Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

— (1958): Experience and Nature. New York: Dover Publications.

— (1981): The Philosophy of John Dewey: 1. The Structure of Experience, 2. The Lived Experience. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

— (2005): Art as Experience. New York: Penguin Group.

— (2008): The Later Works 1925-1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

— (2012): Unmodern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

DONOSO, A. (2011): “Dewey in Spain and Spanish America”, Pragmatism in the Americas. New York: Fordham University Press.

GRAHAM, J. T. (1994): A Pragmatist Philosophy of Life in Ortega y Gasset. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

— (2001): The Social Thought of Ortega y Gasset: A Systematic Synthesis in Postmodernism and Interdisciplinarity. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

— (1997): Theory of History in Ortega y Gasset: The Dawn of Historical Reason. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

MCDERMOTT, J. (1977): The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. (1989): Una interpretación de la historia universal. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

— (2003): Historia como sistema y otros ensayos de filosofía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

— (2005): En torno a Galileo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.

— (2006): El tema de nuestro tiempo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

— (2007): La rebelión de las masas. Madrid: Austral.

— (2007) Meditaciones del Quijote. Madrid: Cátedra Letras Hispánicas.

TILES, J. E. (1992): John Dewey: Critical Assessments. Vol. IV. New York: Routledge.

Published

2020-05-01 — Updated on 2020-05-01

How to Cite

Faye Binder, M. (2020). José Ortega y Gasset: A Pragmatist Perspective on History. Revista De Estudios Orteguianos, (40), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.63487/reo.181

Issue

Section

Ponencias